Case study: Rheological properties of cornstarch | Labomat

Case study: Rheological properties of cornstarch

Case study: Rheological properties of cornstarch

Contactez-nous

CONTACT

SOCIETE

Description

Rheological properties of cornstarch

Image d'amidon de maïs de l'application en poudre

USE

Thickens sauces and gravies and is used for cooking.

TEST EQUIPMENT

Instrument: powder flow tester (PFT)

Tank: 230 cc, 6 inches in diameter (standard volume)

Lid Type: Pallet Lid, 33cc, 6 inch diameter

Wall cover, 2B finish, 6 inches in diameter

Test Type: Flow Function Test, Wall Friction Test

Temperature: Room temperature (70-72 ° F)

Humidity: 47.5%

METHOD

A Brookfield powder flow tester equipped with Powder Flow Pro software for automated instrument control and data acquisition. The corn starch was picked up in the trough, and the scraping tool was then used to evenly distribute the powder in the trough. After recording the sample weight and entering it into the software, a standard flow function test and then a wall friction test were performed. The time required for each test was 25 minutes and 13 minutes respectively.

MEASURED PARAMETERS

Fluidity: Very cohesive to fluid

Wall friction: 35 ° to 29 °

Apparent density: 625 kg / m 3 (filling density) to 800 kg / m 3

TO ANALYSE

Hopper shape: Conical

Critical arch dimension: 63.1 mm (2.5 in.)

RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the fluidity of corn starch at different levels of consolidation stress. These results show that corn starch, at consolidation stress levels above 6 kPa, is a more easily flowing material. On the other hand, at very low consolidation stresses of less than 1.4 kPa, the starch falls into the very cohesive range and flows with greater difficulty.

Note: Flow function data is indicated by the red line. When interpreting a flow function graph, the data is read from right to left. The rightmost data point indicates the powder flow rate when the hopper is full; the leftmost data point indicates the powder flow when the hopper is nearly empty. Purple lines are standard flow indices that distinguish different types of flow behavior across levels of consolidation, ranging from “free fluid” (lower segment) to “non-fluid” (upper upper segment).

Poudre App Amidon De Maïs Figure 1

Figure 1: Graph of the Compression Ratio Function of Corn Starch

Figure 2 shows the friction angle of the walls at different levels of normal stress. The wall friction angle represents the friction between the sliding powder and the wall of the hopper or chute at the start of flow. In this test, a stainless steel cover was used, illustrating what the friction would look like if the corn starch was in a stainless steel hopper. At a low normal stress of about 0.5 kPa, the effective wall friction angle is about 35 ° and drops to about 29 ° at higher levels of normal stress (4.75 kPa).

Note: Wall friction test and flow function test are independent tests. The flow function test measures the flow of powder through the orifice while the wall friction test measures the flow of powder against a specific building material.

Poudre App Amidon De Maïs Figure 2

Figure 2: Corn Starch Wall Friction Graph

Figure 3 shows the bulk density of the material at different levels of consolidation stress. This graph tells us that corn starch has a filling density of about 625 kg / m³ and amounts to about 800 kg / m³ at about 11 kPa of consolidation stress. In general, a powder that flows more easily will show very small changes (less than 30%) in bulk density, while a cohesive or poorly flowing powder will generally show a large increase (greater than 30%) of the bulk density. In this case, the change in bulk density is 28 %. This material is on the verge of being a more cohesive and difficult to flow material. This is supported by the flow function test which shows that the material flows easily initially at higher consolidations.

Poudre App Amidon De Maïs Figure 3

Figure 3: Bulk density graph of corn starch

CONCLUSION

Corn starch is a very cohesive powder at low consolidation stress levels (less than 1 kPa), cohesive at consolidation stress levels of 1 kPa to 6 kPa, and flows easily at stress levels high consolidation. This means that the cornstarch may have flow issues when the hopper empties. The critical arch dimension of 2.5 inches (63.1 mm) provides a conservative estimate to prevent arching, provided that the minimum outlet dimension of the hopper exceeds this value.

Product Details
16 other products in the same category: